Simple Photography Tips by Michael Blyth: Why Distant Hills Turn Blue – Visual Recession in Photography
- Michael Blyth
- 6 days ago
- 4 min read
When the light is right, the landscape quietly falls away into layers.
Photographers sometimes call this visual recession.
Understanding why changes the way you see distance.
Seven Simple Ways to Use Visual Recession in Your Photography
Look for layers. Mountains, hills, buildings or trees that sit behind one another naturally create depth.
Use atmosphere Haze, mist and distance soften contrast. That softness is your visual depth.
Watch contrast fall away The further something is, the less contrast it carries.
Notice colour cooling Distant forms shift towards blue and grey. That cooling builds spatial depth.
Include a strong foreground A darker or sharper foreground exaggerates recession dramatically.
Use focal length carefully Telephoto lenses stack layers. Wider lenses exaggerate space between them.
Resist over-editing Clarity destroys depth. Let distance remain distant.
Long before cameras existed, painters understood that distance softens. Leonardo loved it. Turner took it to an extreme and Caspar Friedrich built emotional scale from it.
As you know I'm a great fan of Monet, and this is one of the techniques he was master of with his paintings, but it goes way back as artists sought to depict depth.
Leonardo da Vinci, used it in Mona Lisa as he portrayed the distant mountains, and genius that he was, understood the physics of Visual Recession.
JMW Turner took it to the point where the distance almost dissolved, and Caspar Friedrich used it to create structure and scale.
In photography, visual recession isn’t something you get to use every day. But as you train yourself to absorb what is really in front of you, you begin to notice it often. When it is properly captured, the effect can be quietly powerful.
We were high in the Pyrenees, having risen early to avoid the heat as we climbed towards the col, leaving Spain behind us. In the distance stood Vignemale, the highest peak in the French Pyrenees at 3,298 metres. I found myself transfixed. Ridge after ridge dissolved gently into blue. It is an effect I have always loved.
As ever, I'm going to share images and comments around them.
With Image One, the distant peak, positioned in the centre, highlights the stacking effect, and the foreground, much closer and therefore less light scattering creates a real contrast.
With Image Two, I've changed the angle slightly, meaning that there is a greater visual balance in the foreground, but losing the centrality of the peak. Which is nicer? Well that's up to your perspective, which is different to mine.
I've not mentioned it for a while, but I'm a great fan of minimising post production, it takes up so much time. However, for the purposes of this discussion, I've cropped in to exclude the high contrast foreground - which I love!!
Image Four is where I've drawn back ( i was using a Nikon 18-200mm F3.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR DX if you're interested) on the zoom onto mid length. The whole image changes.
Strictly speaking there is even more visual regression, but the lack of blue-haze in the nearer overlaps makes it seem otherwise.
Image Five shows where I've entered wide angle zone and introduced what is essentially a huge distraction by having bright sunlit rocks in the foreground, taking away most of the visual effect I've been talking about.
Image Six, has even more foreground, but because it's much darker, somehow is less distracting from the distance, and the dip in the centre part of the foreground leads the eye down the vally and beyond.
I hope this is helpful as a brief look at this wonderful visual effect.
A Brief Note on the Science Behind It
For those who enjoy knowing why this happens, the effect has a clear physical basis.
The glacial valleys in this region create long, uninterrupted sight lines. From elevation, successive lateral ridges step away in layers.
Add to that the moist Atlantic air that often drifts into the western and central Pyrenees, and contrast gradually softens with distance. It is a clear example of atmospheric perspective.
The physics is straightforward. Shorter blue wavelengths scatter more readily in the atmosphere, a process known as Rayleigh scattering. Particulate matter reduces contrast. Humidity diffuses light. Together, they compress tonal range as distance increases.
The geology plays its part too. Much of this area is pale granite, a relatively light-toned rock that reflects rather than absorbs light. In bright conditions it avoids the heavy shadow contrast you might see in darker volcanic or metamorphic formations. The result is a gentler tonal graduation, which enhances the sense of depth.
Often the perceived colour shift is not just atmospheric. It also happens because the foreground contains warmer reflected light, while the distant landscape receives more diffuse skylight, which is naturally blue.
Late in the day the colours of visual recession can change quite noticeably, because the character of the light itself changes. The sun is lower, the light travels through more atmosphere, and the blue of the sky is no longer the dominant influence.
All of this combines to create that layered, receding quietness
If you want to keep the momentum, subscribe to Simple Photography Tips by Michael Blyth and I’ll send you the Wednesday posts and Friday thoughts as they go live.
If you’re already subscribed, you might have missed my recent email about a new level of involvement with Simple Photography Tips by Michael Blyth, a small, more active space where you’ll get weekly suggestions to help you move forward; get out, notice more, learn to see, and share what you’re making with a handful of like minded others.
Comments